A Reaction to Reaction Videos

Every so often, while mindlessly scrolling through TikTok, I’d come across “first reaction” videos.

I used to be practically compelled to watch them.

Especially if they were reactions to songs by The Beatles.

Now I usually scroll right past them in favour of whatever other time-wasting garbage the algorithm has decided I need.

For a while, I watched a lot of reaction videos. The premise is pretty simple: someone listens to a song or watches a music video they’ve never experienced before, and we get to watch them experience it for the first time.

And I understood the appeal.

Part of it was the novelty of watching somebody discover something I already knew and loved. If someone was hearing “Hey Jude” or “A Day in the Life” or some other Beatles song for the first time, there was something fascinating about watching their face when they encountered the moments I already knew were coming.

There was also something I didn’t fully appreciate at first: watching somebody hear a familiar song with fresh ears freshened my ears.

I’d hear a song I’d listened to hundreds of times, but because somebody else was hearing it for the first time, I’d suddenly pay attention to things I’d stopped noticing. Their reaction could remind me why I loved the song in the first place.

There was, however, one problem.

I was a bit of a musical snob.

Not an especially proud one. But a snob nonetheless.

One of the things that initially fascinated me about reaction videos was how many people seemed to have absolutely no knowledge of music that I considered part of the basic cultural curriculum.

“Here’s my first time listening to ‘Hey Jude’ by The Beatles!”

Wait. What?

You haven’t heard “Hey Jude”?

How is that possible?

It took me a surprisingly long time to understand that the answer is: because not everybody is me.

I think I finally got over this particular bias a few months ago in the most mundane setting imaginable: the checkout at the Superstore.

I had headphones on, although I wasn’t actually listening to anything. The guy working at the checkout was young—maybe in his early twenties—and had one of those naturally buoyant personalities that some people seem to have. He asked me what I was listening to.

“Prince,” I said.

He looked blankly at me.

“Never heard of it.”

I was floored.

How could someone not have heard of Prince?

“Is it good?” he asked.

I told him that if he went home after his shift and started listening to Prince, his life was going to change forever.

“There is nobody better,” I told him.

He said he’d check him out.

Then he asked me if I’d ever heard of Kanye.

I assured him that I was familiar with Kanye.

That little encounter did something for me.

It reminded me that my musical education isn’t everybody else’s musical education. The songs and artists that seem so deeply embedded in my own cultural landscape aren’t necessarily embedded in somebody else’s.

And that’s one of the reasons reaction videos can be so interesting.

But eventually I started noticing something else.

A lot of the people making these videos weren’t actually very interesting to watch.

They were performing their reactions.

I’d watch someone listen to a song, nodding their head occasionally, as if the head nod itself were an important part of the review.

Don’t worry, everybody. I am enjoying the music.

Then they’d pause the song.

“This is really interesting.”

Play another thirty seconds.

Pause.

“I am really digging this.”

Play another thirty seconds.

Pause.

“I love what they’re doing here.”

And sometimes that was it.

I began to wonder if I was actually watching somebody discover music or watching somebody demonstrate what it looks like to discover music.

There is a difference.

I think the final straw was an XTC video.

I don’t remember which song it was. Perhaps No Thugs in Our House? But I remember the guy reacting to it.

And, to be fair, he was enthusiastic.

Very enthusiastic.

He kept stopping the song to point out particular instruments, vocal moments and musical details. I think he was a bassist and his reaction videos focused more on the bass in songs. As he listened, he was clearly enjoying the bass and everything else he was hearing.

And by the end of the video, I believed him.

Almost.

He kept talking about how much this XTC song blew him away and how he was definitely going to explore more of their music.

And then I noticed something.

He kept referencing a playlist of XTC songs on the screen he used to watch videos.

He had just finished listening to one XTC song. And was so adamant and excited to dive further into more XTC.

And yet he didn’t play another one. If he was as compelled as he seemed to dive into more XTC then how could he not click a button right then to play another one? Even as a tease for a future reaction video?

I sat there thinking:

Play another one now, if you love them so much!

You have the playlist right there!

Click the damn thing!

Instead, the video ended.

And I had become convinced that this guy probably wasn’t going to listen to any more XTC.

Maybe he would. I don’t know. I don’t care.

But I think that experience led me to a bit of a realization. I’d seen enough reaction videos by then to become suspicious of the difference between genuine enthusiasm and performed enthusiasm.

So I made a soft vow to myself.

I was done with reaction videos.

Then a month or two ago, TikTok started showing me clips from a YouTube channel called The Charismatic Voice.

The algorithm, of course, knew exactly what it was doing.

The clips were reactions to Beatles songs.

I am apparently incapable of scrolling past Beatles content.

But there was something different about these videos.

The person behind The Charismatic Voice is a former opera singer who has become deeply interested in understanding and exploring the mechanics of singing and the human voice. Her musical background is rooted in classical music and opera, rather than popular music.

And that makes her reactions particularly fascinating.

She’s not pretending that she already knows everything about the music.

She’s discovering it.

And she’s curious. And she is beyond enthusiastic and joyous about what she is hearing.

She’ll hear something in a song and stop to try to understand what is happening vocally. She’ll explore why a particular sound works, what the singer is doing with their voice, why a particular performance is extraordinary.

But more importantly, she seems genuinely delighted by what she’s discovering.

And that’s what pulled me back into reaction videos.

Not the reaction itself.

The enthusiasm.

There is something wonderfully infectious about watching someone who is knowledgeable and curious discover something that you already know is wonderful.

And perhaps that’s the thing I had been missing.

I didn’t really want to watch people react.

I wanted to watch people experience something.

There’s a subtle difference between the two.

A performance says, Look at me having a reaction.

An experience says, Holy shit. Listen to this.

And The Charismatic Voice does the latter.

She isn’t simply saying, “Wow, that’s good.”

She’s asking why it’s good.

What is that singer doing?

What is happening physically?

Why does that note have that effect?

Why does this particular performance make us feel something?

And in doing that, she gives me something I hadn’t realized I was looking for when I started watching reaction videos in the first place.

She makes me hear familiar music differently.

Which brings me back to Prince.

Remember the young guy at the Superstore who had never heard of Prince?

I would like to think that somewhere, sometime, he eventually went home and listened to some Prince.

Because Prince is one of those artists who can make you understand why people get excited about music.

The Charismatic Voice’s first encounter with Prince was a video for Purple Rain. Watching her experience that song is uplifting. Her second time listening to Prince, though, is like watching a life-changing moment unfold before you. The joy and wonder and exuberance and awe she expresses watching the entirety of Prince’s legendary Super Bowl halftime performance is purity and sincerity incarnate. I have linked it below. It is well worth your time.

I’ve now watched many of her reaction videos and am enjoying them immensely. Because she is enjoying the songs immensely.

I find myself watching her for exactly the same reason I had once watched all those other reaction videos.

I wanted to see somebody discover something amazing.

But this time, I believed the reaction.

And maybe that’s the difference.

I don’t think I ever stopped liking reaction videos.

I just stopped liking performative reactions.

And when somebody’s enthusiasm is real, it turns out I’m still very happy to watch them lose their mind over a song I’ve heard a thousand times.

So here’s Prince. Here’s someone who knows very little about Prince discovering Prince for the second time.

This is why I watch reaction videos now.

Or, at least, why I watch hers.

Sketch22 – Funny Or Die – Gay Divorce Sketch

About two weeks ago, Sketch22’s “producer with the Orange Juicer”, Jay-Ro (or Ro-J) [hey, I’m trying to make this post topical with a weak OJ Simpson vibe to it] was contacted by THE guy who runs (or A guy who works for) the website Funny Or Die (that’s the website that was co-founded by Will Farrell, or something, where people can upload videos and then viewers vote whether the videos are “Funny” or if they “Die”) [and THE Guy who contacted us is, like Will’s best friend or something] {so really, it’s like Sketch22 is now a good friend of Will Farrell – tell your friends!} (this sentence, by the way, will be nominated to the “Most Parentheticals In A Single Sentence” category at the upcoming Grammarian Awards [held this year in Nunavut,NWT].

The guy said he saw some of our online video stuff and really liked it (aw shucks and blush!) and said we should enter a video into a new contest coming up.  Apparently, they’re launching a Canadian .ca version of the site and to kick that off, they’re having a contest.  Some of this info may be incorrect.

The challenge of the contest is this:  Videos are to be 2 minutes or shorter, and each video must contain, in some way, the phrase “Pierre Trudeau said there’d be days like this”.  Anyway, we submitted a video, even though we only had about a week to
come up with an idea, shoot and edit it (there, that’s our excuse if
you end up not liking the video).

You can see our submission here:  Sketch22’s Funny Or Die “Gay Divorce Sketch”

We’d love it if you watched it and voted it “Funny”.  If you happen to not care for our video, and if your morals allow you to do so, we’d love it if you still voted it “Funny”.  The very future of Sketch22 depends on your voting that video “Funny”.  Nay, the very future of humanity hinges on you – yes, you, sitting there at your office computer, or at home, or in some coffee shop, living your boring, dull life – voting this video as “Funny”.

Whatever Happened To Kermit After The Muppet Show

Apparently, he went on quite a significant downward spiral.

http://www.youtube.com/v/uLQRv0RjBBM

Technorati Tags: , ,

Sketch22 Wins Some Kind Of Award (Kind Of)

Details are fuzzy on my part, mostly because I wasn’t involved in the whole project.  But here’s what I believe the story is (anyone feel free to correct any errors of fact):
Last summer (like, last last summer, not the summer just previous) LoJo asked some of the gang from Sketch22 if they’d be willing to help out in making a video to help (this is where it gets fuzzy for me) promote the local Chamber of Commerce.  Some of the gang did it.  Not sure why I wasn’t involved.  I probably declined outright, as I am wont to do when people ask me to be involved in endeavours (I am trying to alleviate myself of this tendency on my part.  So if you have a project you want me to be involved in, now is the time to ask.  I promise I won’t decline outright), but some of the group (the rest of the group?) did something.  I haven’t seen it, but I understand it was hella good and the local Chamber liked it.  Am I right in that?
Anyway, the local Chamber sent it off to the Chamber’s Grand Wizard Conference (fuzzy on details) in BigTown, Canada, where it was to be contested against other communities Chamber promotions videos.  Well, turns out it won the People’s Choice award, and the “official” judges gave it 3rd place – Bronze Medal, baby.  And get this:  They paid us two-hundred thousand dollars! (fuzzy)  And get this:  That’s exactly how much money we need to get the farm and the fishin’ outta hock!

And while I am depressed that I wasn’t involved, and depressed that I usually say “no” outright to such projects, and can’t really take any of the credit, I can still begrudgingly toss out some mad props to the rest of the people involved.

So, good work, Sketchers et al.

Technorati Tags: ,

OK Go – Here It Goes Again

OK Go is a band I like OK. They have a number of catchy, upbeat pop songs. However, they’ve begun to compile a number of pretty interesting videos that incorporate some great choreography. I’m a sucker for people dancing who look like dancing isn’t their forte. This is an amazing one-take bit of effort. Wonder how many takes they had to do? Wonder how long they rehearsed?

Technorati Tags: , ,

Pay Me My Money Down

Every time he plays, it’s like his first time, what with the enthusiasm and enjoyment.
Here’s The Boss on a recent Conan O’Brien show, singing a Pete Seeger tune (from Bruce’s latest album, covers of Seeger tunes):

I’ll Say It… I’m In Love With Prince

So, there’s about 15 minutes of air-time to kill yet, before the last-minute announcement of who is the next American Idol.  It’s been an hour and 45 minutes of some really awful medley songs from “the idols” and some slightly better songs from some special guest stars.
We come back from a commercial break and Ryan’s at the podium.  He tells us that that’s it for the guest stars, no more surprises.  So, immediately I know there’s gonna be another surprise.  Especially with 15 minutes left.  He continues talking and I’m wondering if it’s gonna be some lame-duck music icon from decades past, or some lame-duck pseudo-icon from present day.  All of a sudden, Ryan gets interrupted by some horn blasts, and the lights go all funky.
It’s a little jarring, and takes me about two seconds to realise that *this* is the surprise.  Okay, so who’s it gonna be?  Cut to the stage and these two sexy women are dancing.  At the back of the stage, the doors open and somebody is silhouetted.  Somebody small.  He does some Michael Jackson dance moves (or should I say James Brown?).  Surely it’s not Michael, I think to myself.  And then, even before that thought finishes, I understand.  I understand but cannot possibly comprehend.  Because, right there, on the TV, during American Idol… right there, is Prince.
Prince.  On American Idol. 
The thought that it’s some Prince impersonator shoots through my mind, but I don’t believe it.  Yet I cannot believe what I’m seeing.
Prince. On American Idol.
And I gotta say:  He frigging owned that stage.  He sings a coy version of Lolita (from his latest, great album 3121), and he looks like he’s having lots of fun. 
Song ends and I’m very happy.  What a fantastic surprise!  And what a way to end the season.  Prince.  On American Idol.
Then he sings a second frigging song!  (Satisfied, also from 3121).
After that, I think Taylor Hicks won the competition.  I don’t care about that, though.  Friggin’ Prince was on American Idol.

Here’s the YouTube video.  It may not be available for long, so watch it early:

Technorati Tags: , ,

Mission Impossible III – Trailer Review

This is the start of what may become a new semi-irregular feature here at The Annekenstein Monster – Theatrical Trailer Reviews.  It’s not very often that I go to the movies.  While I don’t find the admission price to be too much of a deterrent, the allure of the acutely-expensive popcorn/pop/etc, and the generally poor theatre etiquette of others are more than enough to keep me away.
But I like talking about movies, and since the trailers pretty much give away the whole plot anyway, I figure a smart (ass) review of the trailer should suffice.

So, here’s my review of the theatrical trailer for Mission:Impossible III, which opens tomorrow, world-wide:
As we open on a crisp, blue night-timey cityscape, it’s apparent right away that there’s gonna be some cold-blooded killing going on.  Close in on Tom Cruise, standing on top of a building.  A crisp, blue, glass-encased building, so you know it’s just begging to be broken into.  Or, jumped off of.  Tom looks angry – “Tibbets Is Tough” Angry.  But we don’t know why.  Perhaps he’s just been interviewed about Scientology again?  Maybe the placenta tasted ‘off’?  Zoom in, ever in, to perform a retinal scan of his eye.  Turns out it’s the man they call Ethan Hunt, the Mission Impossiblist, and, judging by the thing that’s burning (either it’s a fuse, or his penis) he’s angry because a) there’s not much time left until something blows or b) Katie just gave him an STD.  Maybe the plot involves trying to get an STD antidote?
Immediatley after the credits, as soon as he puts on the welding glasses, the action starts and you get the feeling it won’t let up again for the whole 2 or 3 minutes of the trailer.  BAM: get out a gun BAM: meet Truman Capote (maybe the plot does involve STD’s?) BAM: meet the girl BAM: meet Larry Fishburne, the guy they got when they couldn’t get Sam Jackson BAM: meet the explosives.  BAM: slow down for some expositional character acting, where the plot gets revealed. Something about Capote looking for some In Cold Blood Redux.  Great acting at this moment, from Cruise particularly, as he looks at the girl, looking all intense and not even moving, hardly.  Can you say “People’s Choice”?  Then, right after the sell-line “This summer, the mission, begins” (excellent work by the way, PR guys.  Top notch line-selling), out of nowhere, comes the weld-spectacled Cruise and it’s all “Explosives, meet BAM!”  And, literally, (SPOILER ALERT!!!) everything starts blowing up and things fly and fall everwhere as we see, I’m pretty sure, scenes from previous Mission Impossible movies (perhaps to catch us up?).  Helicopters zoom, boats zim, rubberized dummy heads shimmer, motorcycles motor, and people everywhere look so sexy and hot with all kinds of implements and devices in their hands.  I’ll say this for Cruise, nobody runs with more intensity than Tom Cruise.  Except, maybe, Forrest Gump.  But for Ethan Hunt, Life is Like A Box of Explosives (you can have that one, PR guys), and to avoid it all, he runs and jumps and kisses and punches, and rides and drives and jumps some more.  Wow!  I’m exhausted!  And there’s still 25 seconds to go!
Finally, we come to the climax of the trailer, and what a climax it is.  Check out this dialogue:
Cruise:  You’ll never get what you want!!!
Truman Capote:  You don’t think I’ll do it!!!!! (and it is NOT a question!  Because you KNOW he damn well will!)
Then, in a marvellous super-agent moment, Cruise is running down a bridge, and a car explodes directly behind him.  Miraculously, instead of forward, the impact waves cause him to be blown sideways (don’t think he hasn’t asked Katie for that, either) into a car.
And that’s the end.
All in all, an action packed trailer.  But, really, if you’ve seen one Mission:Impossible III trailer, you’ve pretty much seen them all.  Only check it out if you’ve got a huge Cruise Missile in your pants for Tom (you can have that one, E!DailyTonight guys)

Trailer for Mission:Impossible III

Technorati Tags: , ,

Christmas Driving Lights

Here’s a video that was part of the Sketch22 Christmas show last year. I’m quite fond of it.
If you prefer to visit the YouTube page where it’s located, here’s the link to Christmas Driving Lights.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

I Can Make It On My Own – Li’l Brudder

Q: What’s more inspirational than a two-legged dog?

A:  A one-legged dog.

Get out your hankies, folks.  These links are a-gonna make you cry.  For the record, neither link made me cry.  Or even come close.  Okay, Li’l Brudder did make me tear up.  Just a bit.  He’s just… he’s just so inspirational.

Technorati Tags: , ,